Search for: "Amendment to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar Re: Rules of Professional Conduct"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
SC14-2126 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 4-7.22—LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:51 am
The Feb. 17 decision, In Re: Amendments to Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-5.5, effectively codifies in Florida’s professional conduct rules what had already been decided by way of an earlier ethics opinion. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Tarbert, We write about proposed amendments to Rule 4-7.13 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, relating to online keyword advertising by attorneys. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
So, if the ABA were to create, let’s say, a new section of their model rules of professional conduct with respect to different forms of communication via social network, the concern is that the states would adopt these regulations in one form or another, and then would engage in behavior similar to what Florida has done, similar to what New York did before their rules were thrown out by the federal court, and over regulate… [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
But even under Sorrell’s heightened but not strict scrutiny, FOPA’s record-keeping, inquiry, and anti-harassment provisions failed.The state argued that the First Amendment wasn’t implicated because any effect on speech was merely incidental to the regulation of professional conduct. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:08 am
In Florida, we're all too aware of this issue. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
It is the duty of the Department to promulgate regulations in a timely fashion. (1) Implementing Regulations. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Florida Bar v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
If the person is seeking admission or re-admission to the industry; and1. the person is subject to an order under Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4)(H)(i), then the person must file an application unless the order imposing a bar on the person is time-limited and the time period is expired. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:20 pm
Const.For the reasons explained below, we approve the referee’s findings of fact and recommendation that the Respondent be found guilty of violating Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-8.2(b) (Judicial and Legal Officials, Candidates for Judicial Office; Code of Judicial Conduct Applies) for personally soliciting campaign contributions in violation of Canon 7C(1) of the Florida Code of Judicial Conduct. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Bar and the State Bar of New York. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:37 pm
The court rejected the defendant’s arguments that (1) the AG’s claims were barred by res judicata based on the prior administrative proceedings brought by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, and (2) the disclosures in the defendant’s revolving credit plan regarding the minimum payment barred any claims based on misrepresentations. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:54 am
District Court, alleging that the state’s recently amended rules of professional conduct regarding online legal communications restrict, unduly burden, and chill the exercise of commercial speech rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
FLORIDA POWER LIGHT/ BROADSPIRE, Appellees. 1st District.Attorneys -- Discipline -- Referee properly found counsel, in his repeated rude, abusive and threatening behavior, violated Rules Regulating the Florida Bar pertaining to making a statement a lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, mediator, arbitrator, adjudicatory officer, or public legal officer;… [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:35 pm
The Florida Bar re Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar -- Rule 4-1.8(e), 635 So.2d 968 (Fla. 1994). [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm
The Advertising & Fee Arrangements Issues Working Group of the Professional Regulation Committee tabled amendments to the Rules of Professional Conduct which would prohibit bait and switch marketing, as well as other practices which have been subject to complaints over the past few years, especially the use of awards and rankings by fictitious or dubious organizations that appear to be intended to mislead the public. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 10:40 am
This distinction’s at the core of our supreme court’s ruling in this case: In Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 9:30 pm
Florida Bar v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:37 pm
Now it’s pretty clear that professional-client speech is indeed subject to more restriction than other speech, though the Supreme Court hasn’t told us just what the rule there is. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
August 25, 2015) — DC Circuit issued a ruling affirming dismissal of a lawsuit challenging a “pay-to-play” rule adopted by the SEC in 2010, holding that the rule could only be challenged in the federal courts of appeal; it was also time-barred. [read post]
