Search for: "Amendments To The Florida Rules Of Juvenile Procedure (Notice)" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2009, 1:24 am
The Florida Supreme Court released the following court rule opinions:Opinions Released Mar. 19, 2009SC08_1612 - In re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile ProcedureSC08_2176 - In re: Approval of Application for Determination of Indigent Status Form For Use By Clerks and Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.984Opinions Released Mar. 5, 2009OP_SC08_1488 - In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm by Tom
Capping a rule-making odyssey that began in 2005, the Florida Supreme Court adopted rules on November 12, 2009, intended to expedite appellate review in dependency and parental termination cases.1 The Court’s opinion amends three bodies of rules: The Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, and the Florida Rules of Appellate… [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:38 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In the wake of a pair of SCOTUS decisions, Graham vs Florida, and more recently, Miller vs Alabama, holding that state juvenile lifer statutes violate the 8th Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:44 am by MBettman
Florida 560 U.S. 48 (2010) (sentencing juvenile non-homicide offenders to life without parole is an Eighth Amendment violation). [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:01 am by MBettman
Florida 560 U.S. 48 (2010) (sentencing juvenile non-homicide offenders to life without parole is an Eighth Amendment violation). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am by MBettman
Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010) (The Eighth amendment prohibits life sentences without parole for juvenile nonhomicide offenders. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 1:36 pm by Dan Bushell
The amendments appear to be modeled on the e-discovery provisions in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Mortgage Bankers Association 13-1052Issue: Whether agencies subject to the Administrative Procedure Act are categorically prohibited from revising their interpretative rules unless such revisions are made through notice-and-comment rulemaking. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Alexander, No. 06-1867 A sentence for sexual abuse of a minor is vacated and remanded where the district court plainly erred in failing to provide notice of an upward variance as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h). [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
(Amended opinion) U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, November 07, 2008 Urcinoli v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors, mostly… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Lopez-Matias, No. 07-1662 An order striking a Notice of Intent to Sentence of Death is vacated where: 1) the U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Leveto, No. 05-4753 Conviction for federal income tax fraud is affirmed where: 1) defendant had knowingly and voluntarily waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and, once properly waived, this right is no longer absolute; and 2) there was no reversible error in several rulings regarding a warrant and summons. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Anderson Merchandisers, LLC 15-492Issue: (1) Whether, when a district court dismisses a complaint without leave to amend, a subsequent motion for leave to amend should be judged by ordinary Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) standards (as the Second, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits have held), or whether a post-judgment motion seeking leave to amend is a “disfavored” motion that the court has “considerable discretion… [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 16 to grant adequate remedies for alleged discovery violations by the government; 5) the government failed to provide timely notice under Fed. [read post]