Search for: "Amendments To The Florida Rules of Traffic Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2021, 8:28 am
Thus, the appellate court reversed the trial court ruling. [read post]
23 May 2023, 3:56 pm
Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
Traffic court cases are temporarily exempt. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
Traffic court cases are temporarily exempt. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Sadly, the Florida Supreme Court also ruled in favor of Daimler Chrysler, stating that the Graves Amendment gives leasing corporations immunity from liability. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:09 pm
Florida personal injury lawyers need to address these issues from a local and state perspective to help represent their clients’ interests in court. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
” More recently, however, the Court has ruled that using a drug-sniffing dog on a residential front porch (Florida v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm
The Supreme Court handed down a notable Fourth Amendment ruling this morning in Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:38 am
Since the claim was not sufficiently pleaded, the court dismissed the hurt woman’s uninsured motorist benefits claim with leave to amend it in the future. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 10:13 am
The post Traffic accident involving Florida girl leads to Medicaid-reimbursement dispute appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:49 pm
The Florida Supreme Court filed a rule to show cause as to why Mr. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:22 pm
In Florida, as in many states, there were what could be characterized as marijuana legalization amendments on the ballots. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
A federal district court in Florida dismissed his lawsuit. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 12:24 pm
Indeed, the legislative history provides that the statute was amended “to make it clear that statements made to an officer by a person involved in an accident shall not be admissible in court but shall otherwise be public record. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 8:38 am
The high court has also ruled that a dog sniff is permissible during a traffic stop because traffic stop does not trigger a search under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 9:24 am
Several years ago, Grits suggested that Supreme Court decisions allowing "pretext stops" would mean that "traffic enforcement will, over time, have less and less to do with ensuring traffic safety and more with getting around the Fourth Amendment." [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm
Before the court issued a ruling, however, the injured man amended his complaint and asserted additional claims against the insurance company. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:56 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that a law prohibiting the use of a car horn for anything other than warning of a traffic hazard was not unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that a law prohibiting the use of a car horn for anything other than warning of a traffic hazard was not unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
The Court issued a seemingly simple rule today in Rodriguez v. [read post]
