Search for: "American Airlines v. Com." Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 pm
North American Airlines. [1] It addressed the question of whether a labor union is entitled to enjoin an air carrier to prevent it from unilaterally altering the working conditions of its pilots, while negotiations for an initial collective bargaining agreement are still pending. [2] The court cited the Supreme Court's interpretation of the status quo provisions of the Railway Labor Act of 1926 in Williams v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm by Eric
” Trademark/Publicity Rights * American Airlines v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Protection v. enforcement: even if protected as a TM, the scope may be limited. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  ”Kim Kreis, et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  In the latter category, we have Gallop v. [read post]
Background on President Biden’s Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy On July 9, 2021, President Biden issued a sweeping proclamation on competition in the American economy, asserting that there has been too much consolidation across many different economic sectors and that this consolidation has harmed workers, farmers, small businesses, startups, and consumers, and has led to vast racial, income, and wealth inequalities.1  This Executive… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
Click here to read more Aviation Industry Jobs Entail More than Just Airlines. --- Nathan Phelps, The Northwestern, February 28, 2010 One of the biggest misconceptions about the aviation industry is that everyone must work for an airline. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
American University Washington College of LawYouTube linkWelcome, Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawWe are in the midst of an historic expansion of internet domain names with more than 1200 new generic top-level domains (“gTLDs”) now competing with <.com>. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
In this connection, three salient points were made: We see no evidence of publicly owned companies in other industries behaving unethically as a pattern: No airlines cutting corners on [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]