Search for: "American Commission Co. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 1,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 5:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Sara Jacobs: “On June 24, 2022 “the Supreme Court of the United States released their decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has announced the cases it will review, and one of those is a sexual harassment case out of Indiana. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
The Commissions Clause provides that the President “shall Commission all the Officers of the United States,” which again suggests that the President himself is not an officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:04 am
The brief, which was co-authored by the Federal Trade Commission, concluded that "[t]he petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm by Unknown
United States (Sacred Sites; Oak Flat/Chi-chil Bildagoteel) Allegany Capital Enteprises, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm by NARF
(Compel Agency Action; Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act) United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to add three new cases for decision at its next Term -- cases on a major issue in commodities exchange regulation (Klein & Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence J. Spiwak
Given the United States’ well-documented (and sordid) experience with public-utility regulation, that’s probably not a good idea. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:44 pm by Eddy Salcedo
Expanding what until recently had been very limited options for U.S. companies to enforce their rights against Chinese companies misappropriating trade secrets, the Federal Circuit in TianRui Group Co. v. [read post]