Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. Trump"
Results 41 - 60
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees is politics, not law. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:15 am
Earlier this year, the Trump administration granted a request from the state of South Carolina for an exception to a federal rule barring discrimination in federally funded child welfare programs. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
He also proposed cutting all federal funding to the OTF in a Dec. 15 letter. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
In response to a Fox employee correctly fact-checking a tweet from Trump regarding Dominion, Tucker Carlson told Sean Hannity ‘[p]lease get her fired…It needs to stop immediately…It’s measurably hurting the company. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
While the court’s opinion reads as a free speech paean, it fails to provide a coherent explanation of how the government’s actions – a series of public statements and private communications between federal officials and the platforms that span the Biden and Trump presidencies – violate the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 10:35 am
But it turns out courts have rejected this distinction, too; the leading case is Council on American Islamic Relations v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:24 pm
This week, she issued her first opinion in an argued case as a judge on that court, American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:03 pm
. . . .V. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:33 am
” Significantly, in the opening salvo of his Concurring Opinion, Justice Alito speaks not of EPA but of EPA’s employees – “[the federal government’s position] “would have put the property rights of ordinary Americans entirely at the mercy of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) employees”. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
The gag order closely tracks the one adopted by the DC Circuit in the federal election interference case against Trump, here with the additional protection for jurors. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm
Concepcion and American Express v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, as well as at Howe on the Court, where it was originally published.] [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
President Trump on Thursday, May 28, signed an executive order targeting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a federal law that protects tech companies from being held liable for third-party content shared on their sites. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
The 1939 law, named after its chief sponsor, limits the political activities of federal employees, as well as some state and local government employees. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Recently, government agencies have been interpreting employment laws in a way that is more favorable toward employees. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm
Presidents get sued daily, of course, but usually in their capacity as head of the federal government, where—for the most part—Congress has waived any immunity. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
In such cases, the cost would be passed from the employer to the insurer, which would, in turn, be reimbursed by the government for any contraception provided to employees covered by the exempt plan. [read post]
