Search for: "American Fruit Growers v. Parker"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2010, 10:48 pm
S. 127, 130 (1948); American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 6:31 pm
“Markedly different” is an offhand comment by the Court, and “distinctive name, character, and use” derives from the Court’s 1931 opinion in American Fruit Growers – which looked to Customs law for the meaning of “manufacture” in the patent statute. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
Thus, a careful textualist would not want to rely upon a dictionary published in 2000 (see PTO Br. in Nuijten at 10), an economics textbook published in 1989 (see PTO Br. at 15), or even a dictionary definition from 1900 that has been cited by the Supreme Court (see PTO Br. at 13, quoting a 1900 dictionary definition recited in American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
The Court has read the §101 term "manufacture" in accordance with dictionary definitions, see Chakrabarty, supra, at 308 (citing American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. [read post]
