Search for: "American Trading & Production Corp. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
United States, decided in 1926, and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 1:22 am
The district court’s judgment was affirmed in all other respects (Car-Freshner Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 12:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on May 9, 2012 sent the case titled GPX International Tire Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:53 am
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:54 pm
BASF Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
The damages award included $240,000 for infringing products sold directly into the United States, $2 million for infringing products sold to foreign customers who intended to ultimately sell those products into the United States, and $87 million for infringing products sold abroad and that were not designated for resale into the U.S., although a portion of those sales displaced foreign sales for Hetronic. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
The damages award included $240,000 for infringing products sold directly into the United States, $2 million for infringing products sold to foreign customers who intended to ultimately sell those products into the United States, and $87 million for infringing products sold abroad and that were not designated for resale into the U.S., although a portion of those sales displaced foreign sales for Hetronic. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:56 am
See Acme United Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
See, generally, Ava Ruha Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Jan. 31, 2020), the district court found that plaintiff stated a claim under the DTSA where the defendant was accused of misappropriating plaintiff’s trade secrets and using them to replicate the plaintiff’s salad production facility. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am
Implication of the Lanham Act could result from something as simple as shipping products or materials through the United States, having an agent within the United States, exporting product from the United States, or having a United States company sell infringing products (even if these infringing products never touch United States soil) overseas. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
United States, 370 U. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
But Industria does not advertise or sell its Zenú or Ranchera products in the United States and there are no market surveys specific to the United States for Zenú or Ranchera. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:36 am
Evergreen opposed defendants' motions, arguing that the complaint met the standard established in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
Services Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Benson v. [read post]
