Search for: "American Trading & Production Corp. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am by D. Brad Hughes, Esq.
  Implication of the Lanham Act could result from something as simple as shipping products or materials through the United States, having an agent within the United States, exporting product from the United States, or having a United States company sell infringing products (even if these infringing products never touch United States soil) overseas. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am by D. Brad Hughes, Esq.
  Implication of the Lanham Act could result from something as simple as shipping products or materials through the United States, having an agent within the United States, exporting product from the United States, or having a United States company sell infringing products (even if these infringing products never touch United States soil) overseas. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:36 am by WIMS
Evergreen opposed defendants' motions, arguing that the complaint met the standard established in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]