Search for: "American Trading & Production Corp. v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Studies now show that people eating dairy products like whole milk have less of a problem with heart disease than those who do not.In United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Avon State Bank, David Gibson, a man who purported to be the son of a business associate of Ambrose Herdering, a customer of Avon State Bank, sought out the assistance of Herdering in moving the estate of Gibson’s deceased father from the Netherlands to the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:43 am
Explaining that the ruling in Jazz Photo Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
This two-step “full disk” encryption process makes iPhones more secure, but it also means Apple cannot unlock its own products. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
Railroads became the pioneers in this area, and their efforts to report and control costs, and to measure production and operating ratios, were major catalysts in the development of the accounting profession in the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
Slater decided that his future lay in emigrating to the United States, he faced such draconian trade-secrets laws in his native Britain (which tried to enforce them in a failed attempt to prevent new technology from arriving to the United States) that he had to keep his travel plans secret from family and friends, and disguise himself as a farm labourer. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
The European Parliament's shadow rapporteur Dietmar Köster said "The reform of copyright also concerns linguistic precision - a distinction should be made between Anglo-American copyright and continental European authors' rights. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 11:47 am
The first is American Power Pull Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 4:07 pm
That is, negligible or early stage components of products assembled or processed in the United States do not offend the law. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am
National / International News <> House Hearing On "Waters of the United States" Proposal - The House Agriculture Committee, Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry held a hearing on the EPA-Corps of Engineers propoal defining "Waters of the United States" or WOTUS. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
Services Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
Plywood Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm
One of the first posts on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® was about Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Prior to launch of Lecaent in the United Kingdom the First, Second and Third Defendants and each of them shall ensure that each pack of Lecaent supplied to a pharmacist is accompanied by removable notification that is easily legible stating:'This product is not authorised for the treatment of pain and must not be dispensed for such purposes.'5. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
In the first case, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ultimately ruled that the claims of the Native American petitioners were barred by laches. [read post]
