Search for: "Ames, A. v. Gallagher, J." Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am by INFORRM
He made a similar point nearly seven years later: “On any view, the law regarding the openness of a financial remedy hearing which is not wholly or mainly about child maintenance is regrettably unclear and contradictory”: Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52, per Mostyn J at [80] (13 June 2022). [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
No. 2385 at para. 15 (Gen Div.), per Farley J. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am by MBettman
I am re-posting Attorney Bill Gallagher’s guest post on bail reform to include some additional information from him. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Alvarado, Erick Alvarez, Sharon Amborn, Ken Ambrose, Tom Ambrosi, Will Amen, Tamara Ames, Brent Amfahr, Ralph M. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Hanson v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 1048 (QB). [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The following draws heavily on the summary of the principles in those cases by Perell J. in Watkins v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill… [read post]