Search for: "Ames v. Attorney General" Results 1 - 20 of 3,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 3:13 am by sally
Regina (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice (Attorney General and another intervening); Regina (AM) v Director of Public Prosecutions and others (Same intervening) [2012] EWHC 2381 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 248 “The court should not depart from the long established position that voluntary euthanasia was murder unless article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms required that it be recognised as a possible… [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
If you're an attorney with the government -- here, with the California Attorney General's Office -- you clearly don't have a First Amendment right to represent whatever clients you want on the side. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:35 pm
My experience has been that those attorneys are generally pretty darn good. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 2:02 am
This news article in Law.Com reports on the Pan Am v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am by Ed Bates, University of Southampton
I am simplifying matters, but, in some ways the minority in that case took the line that the Attorney General is now arguing for. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am by Josh Blackman
I am thrilled to pass along this press release: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton today announced his appointment of Aaron Nielson as Solicitor General. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:50 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The California Attorney General today filed a notice of appeal in the Jones v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 10:24 am
The Attorney General seems to have problems with its civil investigative demand (CID) but I am relying on the Indiana Lawyer on this one:The Indiana Attorney General must provide at least a verified petition to a court to enforce a civil investigative demand and show the demand is proper, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today.In Nu-Sash of Indianapolis, Inc. d/b/a McKee Sunroom Designs v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 7:49 pm
http://www.4shared.com/dir/9534755/19d8052b/sharing.html I am not sure why the news has not picked up on this yet, possibly because the state legislature had numerous news conferences saying this law was constitutional, I am presuming the Attorney General's office has chosen not to inform the media at this time. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 1:03 pm by Kate Fort
Law 360, New Indian Child Welfare Act Challenges On The Horizon The Texas v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm by Patent Docs
In this presentation, MBHB attorneys James Lovsin and George "Trey" Lyons, III will take a look at the decrease in discretionary denials of proceedings (and denials to institute, in general), the application by the Federal Circuit of the IPR estoppel statute, and the Supreme Court's decision in Arthrex v. [read post]