Search for: "Ames v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
<> New tests find bee-killing pesticides in 51% of "bee-friendly" plants from garden centers across U.S. and Canada - Metro Detroit plants found to contain the hazardous pesticide [DETROIT, MI]– Many "bee-friendly" home garden plants sold at Home Depot (NYSE: HD), Lowe's (NYSE: LOW) and Walmart (NYSE: WMT) have been pre-treated with pesticides. . . [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 11:21 am by Richard Renner
Parexel International LLC, ARB No. 07-123, ALJ Nos. 2007-SOX-39 and 42 (ARB May 25, 2011), is entitled to deference, and how the legislative history showed that in enacting SOX, Congress relied on the Third Circuit's decision in Passaic Valley Sewerage Comm. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
The Application of the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “Suffer or Permit” Standard in the Identification of Employees Who Are Misclassified as Independent Contractors.Sounding very much like a workers' compensation standardized employment status test, the US Department of Labor has added its interpretation this developing area of the law. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Olsher, where a mobile home park tenant injured in a gang-related shootout involving another tenant sued the landlord, claiming it "had breached a duty not to rent to known gang members. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
Ams., LLC (In re Miller), 570 F.3d 633, 639 (5th Cir.2009) ("[P]erceived poor drafting [in BAPCPA] should not be regarded as a license to invalidate plain-text readings in the name of fixing a statute that some believe is broken. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
CPSC 2008 Performance and Accountability Report, November 2008) Meanwhile, traffic fatalities in the United States have fallen to record lows. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Federal courts have held that relatively low numbers satisfy the “numerosity” requirement, and they have applied a low threshold when evaluating whether a named plaintiff’s claims share “common” questions of law or fact with the claims of absent class members. [read post]