Search for: "Amusements Enterprises, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
2023 delivered a banner year for investor recoveries, as the $7.9 billion[1] in settlement funds across the globe was the highest total in the last five years. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:28 am by Sasha Volokh
Glen Theatre, Inc. upheld a requirement that dancers wear pasties and G-strings, it didn't rely on any theory that nude dancing was non-communicative. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am by Wim Alberts
’” (page 31 – with reference to the well-known decision in Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am by Ad Law Defense
  “Public accommodations” includes private enterprises whose operations affect commerce and who fall within one of twelve enumerated categories (broadly covering everything from grocery stores to amusement parks to places of education). [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
 Faced with an enterprise seen to be profiting from its own famous franchise, they did not hold back: as amended, the brief claims more than 50 copyright infringements, pleaded in full Technicolor®. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:20 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., et al., holding that FanFest—a five-day interactive baseball theme park organized in conjunction with Major League Baseball’s 2013 All-Star Week and held at the Javits Center in New York City—is an “establishment” for purposes of the FLSA’s seasonal amusement or recreational establishment exemption, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
.* Consultation event on Court Fees for the Unified Patent Court - and news on timing of UK implementationDarren reports on the consultation event on the Court fees for the Unified Patents Court, a joint enterprise between the Intellectual Property Office, the IP Federation, and the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys.* Not so secret agent: when Bond isn't 007 but 0.77In "The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no… [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:56 am by Patricia Salkin
This case arose from an event hosted by Cavalia USA, Inc., which held its outdoor entertainment traveling horse show on the Noble parking lot. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
Any one of these developments would be grave for any normal lawyer or legal enterprise. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Williams Enterprises, Inc., 876 F.2d 186, 188 n.2 (D.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:19 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Republic Graphics, Inc., 315 F.2d 847, 849 (2d Cir. 1963). [read post]