Search for: "Amy Davidson" Results 101 - 120 of 236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
”From the New Yorker: Amy Davidson asks, "What Does Marriage Equality Have To Do with Dred Scott? [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 4:46 am
From "Trump’s Message: His Critics Are the Crazy Ones" by Amy Davidson Sorkin (The New Yorker):“Being Presidential is easy,” Donald Trump, who seems, in fact, to find it very hard, said to the crowd at a rally for his reëlection campaign in Dallas on Thursday night. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:25 am
Writes Amy Davidson in The New Yorker, with the sentimentality that Rockwell haters loathe about Rockwell. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:12 am
Asks Amy Davidson (at The New Yorker), attempting to analyze yesterday's oral argument in Trump's immigration case. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:37 am by admin
Deputy Amy Kemper was struck by a suspected drunk driver in a head-on collision on Saturday, March 10. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:08 pm
"From Amy Davidson at The New Yorker: "Five Questions About the Bombing of a Hospital in Kunduz": What did the Afghan forces want us to bomb? [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:27 am
Transparency is crucial" — by Amy Davidson Sorkin.I agree that the trials should be televised, as I wrote in "The ACLU sides with Trump: The gag order is unconstitutional" (October 26, 2023) and — quoting Trump's lawyers — "The prosecution wishes to continue this travesty in darkness. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 10:18 am
From Amy Davidson's piece in The New Yorker (boldface added):The talking-points controversy was always strangely misdirected—in part because, as this report makes clear, there is a lot that was substantively wrong with the way things were managed in Benghazi. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 7:28 am by Jack Bogdanski
In the lead Talk of the Town article dated today, Amy Davidson Sorkin, writing about the January 6 hearings, lets loose with three umlauts in just nine paragraphs. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:26 am by John Day
 The lawyers for the patient are Matt Hardin, ably assisted on this issue by Amy Farrar. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:08 am by Adam Klasfeld
On July 1, 2017, Davidson sent Howard a profane and angry email opining that Trump “owes everything to AMI & he fucked u. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 7:47 am by James Romoser
Wade (Amy Davidson Sorkin, The New Yorker) Roe ‘settled’ law? [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:53 am by SCOTUSblog
(Amy Davidson Sorkin, The New Yorker)) The Supreme Court Is Crippling Environmental Protections. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:36 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court Revives Trump-Era Environmental Regulation (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Three Republicans for Ketanji Brown Jackson (Amy Davidson Sorkin, The New Yorker) The Supreme Court’s Surprisingly Great Decision Against Lying Cops and Prosecutors (Mark Joseph Stern, Slate) What’s Really Going On With the Supreme Court? [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 7:01 am by SCOTUSblog
(Amy Davidson Sorkin, The New Yorker) The post The morning read for Thursday, April 27 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
24 May 2022, 7:26 am by James Romoser
White, The Wall Street Journal) A Conservative Lawyer’s New Target After Abortion: Affirmative Action (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) A Consequential Gun Ruling After the Buffalo Massacre (Amy Davidson Sorkin, The New Yorker) Supreme Court Rejects Prejudice Requirement for Defeating a Motion to Compel Arbitration (R. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:18 am
Novelli, Vice President of Worldwide Government Affairs, to testify on its behalf on Thursday, while Google will once again send Alan Davidson, Director of Public Policy for the Americas. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:34 am by James Romoser
Wade (Mary Ziegler, The New York Times) The Supreme Court Wonders Where the Texas Abortion Law Might Lead (Amy Davidson Sorkin, The New Yorker) No, Really, Roe Is Supported by the Text and History of the Constitution (David Gans, The Atlantic) The post The morning read for Thursday, Nov. 4 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:24 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Monday morning read: Vaccine Mandates Have a Bad Day at the Supreme Court (Amy Davidson Sorkin, The New Yorker) Supreme Court ruling on mandates may depend on how the justices value vaccines (Joan Biskupic, CNN) Sloppy Arguments Over COVID Mandates at SCOTUS (UPDATED) (Jonathan Adler, The Volokh Conspiracy) Chief Justice Roberts minimizes U.S. [read post]