Search for: "Anderson"
Results 1 - 20
of 15,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Charles Hamilton Houston and the Supreme Court Justices He Knew, a virtual lecture by José Felipé Anderson, University of Baltimore School of Law, the author of Genius for Justice: Charles Hamilton Houston and the Reform of American Law, is now up on the Supreme Court Historical Society’s YouTube channel. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Anderson and Jocelyn S. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Anderson and Jocelyn S. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:48 am
Becky Anderson, Mostafa Salem, and Jennifer Hansler report for CNN. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:00 am
Government Watchdog Alleges Trump Campaign Broke the Law Trying to Hide Legal Payments Yahoo News – Zach Anderson (USA Today) | Published: 4/25/2024 A complaint filed with the FEC alleges Donald Trump’s 2024 White House campaign and its related political committees engaged in a scheme to conceal who is being paid for much of the former president’s legal work in a possible violation of federal law. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:08 pm
Anderson Franco Law has a strong track record of advocating for workers who have been injured by others. [read post]
2 May 2024, 12:22 pm
Zenith Radio, 475 U.S. 574 (1986), Anderson v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am
Ironically, Weissmann’s lack of concern for the implications of such an interpretation is reminiscent of his prior sweeping arguments as a prosecutor that led to the stinging defeat in the Anderson case. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Anderson and Jocelyn S. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Anderson and Jocelyn S. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Campaign Finance National: “Government Watchdog Alleges Trump Campaign Broke the Law Trying to Hide Legal Payments” by Zach Anderson (USA Today) for Yahoo News Elections National: “States Move to Label Deepfake Political Ads” by Gopal Ratnam for Roll Call Ethics California: “Legislative Non-Disclosure Agreement Bill Fails First Vote in California Committee” by Alan Riquelmy for Courthouse News Service… [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Anderson, Justices Jackson and Gorsuch both asked why the President was not specifically enumerated in the list of covered offices in Section 3–those who had to take the oath and those who would be subject to disqualification. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
Anderson. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:26 pm
The first time Goldberg-Polin’s parents saw that video was following an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper in October. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
Maria Dugas (Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University) has posted Addressing anti-Black Racism in Sentencing: A Critical Comparison of R v Anderson, and R v Morris (The Canadian Bar Review | December 2024 (v 102(3))) on SSRN. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:25 pm
Jurors split 11to 1 in favor of Alba’s claim of racial discrimination against the state, Anderson said. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm
Anderson, which concerned state-level attempts to remove Trump from the ballot, which the court ruled violated the Constitution), a federal grand jury indicted Trump on several charges related to his actions after the 2020 presidential election: conspiring to defraud the United States; corruptly obstructing the certification of the presidential election results on Jan. 6, 2021; and conspiring to violate one or more person’s constitutional right to vote and have one’s vote… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:21 am
Robert Anderson presented the Judy Stinson Lecture at Arizona State University on the topic of "Reclaiming the Singular They in Legal Writing. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
Anderson, 601 U.S. ___ (2024) was argued in the Supreme Court on February 8, 2024, and the Court issued a per curiam opinion that restored Trump to the Colorado ballot – with concurring opinions – on March 4, just 25 days after the oral argument. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
