Search for: "Anderson v. Bradley"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:40 pm
The firm (like it matters): Maron Marvel Bradley & Anderson. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, seeking back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, together with injunctive relief preventing the recurrence of such misconduct.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson noted, “One would hope that a healing facility would have the understanding and compassion to honor a reasonable accommodation for an injury that was suffered at its own workplace …. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that “Federal law requires employers to accommodate sincerely held religious beliefs if reasonable accommodation can be made without causing undue burden to the business. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:56 am
Anderson wanted to meet with Bradley alone, Davis said, and the two went into a separate room. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:05 am
Perry, Conscience v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama,In addition to the monetary settlement, the companies have agreed to revise their training and employment practices and will educate their employees about their rights (and responsibilities) under federal law.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that, “Under Title VII, employers must provide a workplace free from severe or pervasive sexual harassment …. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama,In addition to the monetary settlement, the companies have agreed to revise their training and employment practices and will educate their employees about their rights (and responsibilities) under federal law.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that, “Under Title VII, employers must provide a workplace free from severe or pervasive sexual harassment …. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
And shall advise all employees of their rights under federal law.In a written statement, EEOC Birmingham District Director Bradley Anderson, noted that “Requiring individuals during the hiring process to answer invasive questions about medical conditions of their grandparents, parents or children violates GINA …. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
In addition to compensating the employee, the company has agreed to modify its polices and practices to ensure compliance with the law.In a written statement, Bradley Anderson, district director of EEOC’s Birmingham office, observed, “An employer has a duty to protect its employees from a hostile environment of frequent or serious sexual harassment when it knows of the ongoing harassment ….It is an unacceptable and unlawful practice to ignore complaints and… [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
”Because such conduct allegedly violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the EEOC file suit (EEOC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Anderson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Anderson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
” At Crimmigration, Nicholas Anderson and Linus Chan discuss the Court’s recent grant in Mathis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Bradley Anderson, a third party, claimed that the equipment was his, not Nosyuiaido’s, and moved to quash the writ. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:22 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Connick v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm
Anderson to discuss the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Dec. 1 ruling in Trump v. [read post]
