Search for: "Anderson v. City Council" Results 1 - 20 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Significantly, his posts discussed communications received from other city officials and solicited feedback from the public on issues of concern. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:29 am by Ned Foley
City of Anderson appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
On 30 November 2022, the Supreme Court of Victoria dismissed an application for leave to appeal a decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal on whether documents held by the Frankston City Council concerning charges brought against the applicant, Mr Huang, which were subsequently withdrawn, must be provided to him under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 in the case of Huang v Frankston City Council [2022] VSC 733. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
Even in the context of prevention of secrecy in government, "the public interest in protecting the privacy of noise complainants and in preventing a chilling effect on complaints, clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure of complainants' names…" City of San Jose v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
Sullivan "actual malice" standard, and of some states' decisions to extend the standard to all public-concern speech, is to prevent this chilling effect.[4] Likewise, all states recognize a "fair and accurate report" privilege that allows news outlets to freely publish reports of government proceedings (such as trials), even if some of the allegations aired by parties or witnesses in those proceedings are false.[5] But some states exclude reports of confidential or sealed… [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 10:59 am by Emily Dai
Dawn Zoldi wrote about the case RaceDayQuads v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
” Chad Anderson, a senior security researcher for threat intel firm DomainTools, told The Register that the proposed NIS Directive will have no impact on whistleblowers and leak sites designed to protect anonymity. [read post]