Search for: "Anderson v. Dept of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2018, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Such allegations sound in negligent misrepresentation and are analogous to the inaccurate findings that the Court of Appeals found to be actionable in Ossining Union Free School Dist. v Anderson LaRocca Anderson, (73 NY2d 417 [1989]). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:59 am by David G. Badertscher
Clarence WILLIAMS, also known as Fletcher Anderson Worrell, Defendant- Appellant.2010 WL 3909987, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.,2010. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
Dept. of Correction, Westville Control Unit, et al (NFP) - "Appellant-plaintiff Eric D. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by MBettman
McDonald Village Police Dept., 70 Ohio St.3d 351, 639 N.E.2d 31 (1994) ( R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(b) applies to the actions of a law-enforcement officer.) [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:57 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
ALP’s exculpatory clause was an almost verbatim copy of the language of Section 402 (b) (1) of the Business Corporation Law, and a twin of the exculpatory clause in an LLC’s operating agreement in John v Varughese, 194 AD2d 799 [2d Dept 2021], a case about which we recently wrote. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Using HGN scores alone resulted in 100% classification of BAC >.10% and 90% correct classification below .10%. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  However, the testimony about purported genetic predisposition to the disease was rejected as speculative, because no genetic link to SJS/TEN has yet been discovered:Defendants are correct that [the expert] testimony on the subject would be speculative and irrelevant. [read post]