Search for: "Anderson v. U.S. Postal Service" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Postal Inspection Service and how the skills she learned at both of those jobs have helped her as a representative: Wittes sat down with Shane Harris to discuss Harris’ recent Washington Post article on the Nord Stream 2 attacks and who could be responsible for them: Saraphin Dhanani sat down with Anderson to discuss the core legal issues that U.S. policymakers need to consider as they weigh whether and how to move forward with seizing and diverting any… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 9:39 am by Susan Brenner
Postal Service, with fraudulently procuring disability benefits. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 5:46 am by William Ford
Postal Service released the SF-86 of a congressional candidate and former CIA officer. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:11 pm by Orin Kerr
 For example, if a person sends a letter in what the Postal Service used to call “Fourth Class” mail — that is, mail that the Postal Service reserves the right to open — then it is not protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The US Postal Service dedicates a stamp to Constance Baker Motley (Columbia Law School). [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:17 pm by Sara Chimene-Weiss, Helen White
Postal Service (USPS) regulations prohibiting guns from both the post office and the adjacent parking lot is illustrative. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Check out this case:It basically states that unless your lender actually signs your loan modification agreement then YOU DON'T HAVE A LOAN MODIFICATION.Has anyone actually gotten a signed loan modification? [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The information included personal information Capital One routinely collected at the time it receives credit card applications, including names, addresses, zip codes/postal codes, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
Part 1 of this series examined proposals to fund media content via a tax on consumer electronics, broadband service, or cell phone bills.[1] Part 2 critiqued proposals to impose fees on broadcast spectrum licenses and channeling the proceeds to a “public square channel” or some other type of public media or “public interest” content.[2] Other essays in this series will address proposals to tax private advertising revenues to support public media; expand… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]