Search for: "Andrew Koppelman" Results 261 - 280 of 371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm by Rick Garnett
Shamelessness ahead:  First Amendment Stories (Foundation 2011), edited by Andrew Koppelman and some guy named Garnett, is out and available. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:37 am by Tom Goldstein
Among our five favorite comments from yesterday are these: Andrew Koppelman – DOMA is doomed The Supreme Court will probably strike down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which indiscriminately withholds federal recognition from same-sex marriages for all purposes – Social Security, health insurance for federal employees, family benefits for soldiers killed in action. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Walter Murphy is unfortunately largely known to legal audiences only through the work of such outstanding mentees as Sandy Levinson, Jim Fleming, Christopher Eisgruber, Andrew Koppelman, Jennifer Nedelsky, and Robert George. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:40 am by Jason Mazzone
" I expect to have a draft of the article up at SSRN soon.]Update: My colleague-in-blogging, Andrew Koppelman attributes to me the view that "the Constitution is violated whenever Congress does anything unprecedented. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:16 am by Joshua Matz
Also, SCOTUSblog’s symposium on same-sex marriage added four posts on Monday, from Andrew Koppelman of Northwestern University, Jana Singer of the University of Maryland, Robin Wilson of Washington and Lee University, and Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California, Irvine. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:45 am by Andrew Koppelman
The following contribution to our same-sex marriage symposium is written by Andrew Koppelman, John Paul Stevens Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science at Northwestern University. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am by Steve Sanders
  Andrew Koppelman has written that such laws could plague same-sex couples with “constant, confusing changes in their legal status,” because “their marriage would cease (or, perhaps, become dormant; it is unclear whether it should spring back to life when they, or one of them, moves back to the state in which they were married). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:08 am by Kiera Flynn
    On Friday, SCOTUSblog’s symposium on same-sex marriage added additional contributions from Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of the University of California-Irvine’s School of Law, and from Northwestern Law School’s Andrew Koppelman. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by Andrew Koppelman
The following contribution to our same-sex marriage symposium is written by Andrew Koppelman, John Paul Stevens Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science at Northwestern University. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:21 pm by Dale Carpenter
Duncan, John Eastman, William Eskridge, Maggie Gallagher, Charles Fried, Andrew Koppelman, Pamela Karlan, Robert Levy, Laurence Tribe, Brian Raum, Ruthann Robson, Robin Wilson, Kenji Yoshino, and me. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:52 am by Lawrence Solum
Louis) Richard Garnett (Notre Dame) Fred Gedicks (BYU) Michael Helfand (Pepperdine) James Davison Hunter (Virginia) Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern) Samuel Levine (Touro) Barry McDonald (Pepperdine) Michael Moreland (Villanova) David Opderbeck (Seton Hall) Michael Paulsen (St. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:21 pm by uwlegalscholarship
Louis) Richard Garnett (Notre Dame) Fred Gedicks (BYU) Michael Helfand (Pepperdine) James Davison Hunter (Virginia) Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern) Samuel Levine (Touro) Barry McDonald (Pepperdine) Michael Moreland (Villanova) David Opderbeck (Seton Hall) Michael Paulsen (St. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:05 am by Kali Borkoski
Duncan – Marriage Law Foundation John Eastman – Chapman University School of Law William Eskridge – Yale Law School Maggie Gallagher – Institute for Marriage and Public Policy Charles Fried – Harvard Law School Andrew Koppelman – Northwestern University School of Law Pamela Karlan – Stanford Law School Robert Levy – Cato Institute Laurence Tribe – Harvard Law School Brian Raum – Alliance Defense Fund Ruthann Robson –… [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 6:22 am by Lawrence Cunningham
Louis) Richard Garnett (Notre Dame) Fred Gedicks (BYU) Michael Helfand (Pepperdine) James Davison Hunter (Virginia) Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern) Samuel Levine (Touro)  Barry McDonald (Pepperdine) Michael Moreland (Villanova) David Opderbeck (Seton Hall) Michael Paulsen (St. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:19 pm by Olivier Moréteau
Louis) Richard Garnett (Notre Dame) Fred Gedicks (BYU) Michael Helfand (Pepperdine) James Davison Hunter (Virginia) Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern) Samuel Levine (Touro) Barry McDonald (Pepperdine) Michael Moreland (Villanova) David Opderbeck (Seton Hall) Michael Paulsen (St. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm by Olivier Moréteau
Louis) Richard Garnett (Notre Dame) Fred Gedicks (BYU) Michael Helfand (Pepperdine) James Davison Hunter (Virginia) Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern) Samuel Levine (Touro) Barry McDonald (Pepperdine) Michael Moreland (Villanova) David Opderbeck (Seton Hall) Michael Paulsen (St. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:11 am by Neil Siegel, guest-blogging
Lash does not accurately describe the work of Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, Donald Regan, Robert Stern, and others. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
Andrew Koppelman insists that courts should rely on Resolution VI because the Resolution is the “functional equivalent” of Article I, Section 8—as in, Resolution VI “functions as the equivalent” of Article I, Section 8.I think this is an accurate description of what Resolution VI proponents are about—effectuating the general principle of the Resolution should be the standard by which we measure proper interpretations of the text, as should be the… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
In his Yale Law Journal On-Line essay, Bad News For Mail Robbers: The Obvious Constitutionality of Health Care Reform, Andrew Koppelman cites Balkin’s work and declares that the framers accepted Article I, Section 8 as “the functional equivalent” of Resolution VI. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am by Neil Siegel, guest-blogging
 As Robert Stern, Donald Regan, Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, and other scholars have concluded, the Committee was embracing, not rejecting, the Resolution’s concern about interstate collective action problems when it provided an enumeration. [read post]