Search for: "Andrew R Lincoln "
Results 101 - 120
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 4:46 am
Posted by: Andrew W. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) The foreign emoluments clause provides that “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm
Senate Democrats who voted in favor were Baucus, Dorgan, Jeffords, Kohl, Landrieu, Lincoln, Nelson (Neb.), Pryor, Reid, Rockefeller, Salazar and Warner. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:12 am
Human Rights Campaign Institute for Science and Human Values Jewish Women International Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Legal Momentum Media Equity Collaborative Muslim Advocates National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity National Black Justice Coalition National Center for Lesbian Rights National Coalition Against Domestic Violence National Council of Jewish Women National Council of Women’s Organizations National Disability Rights Network National Domestic Violence Hotline… [read post]
22 May 2022, 6:30 am
Deborah R. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 9:55 pm
(Attempts to operate a national bank under the aegis of the federal government, authorized to issue its own paper notes, came to an end when President Andrew Jackson refused to renew its charter. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
”.Levinson and Balkin think that Lincoln’s suggestion of emergency power does not quite fit their type one because they characterize Lincoln as offering a “controversial interpretation” of the Constitution, rather than asserting the power to violate it. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 3:48 pm
Andrew (Mich. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
Andrew L. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
How to Do Surgery on the Constitutional Law of Libel, SMU Law Review, Forthcoming, R. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
[T]he Lincoln conspirators’ trial was a matter of paramount national importance and attracted intense public scrutiny. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:57 pm
" I attended the last preview performance of Andrew Bovell's "When the Rain Stops Falling" at Lincoln Center Theater's Mitzi E. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
Michael Andrews, Stephanie Stephens Monplaisir and Charles J. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:54 am
Someone beat me to the obvious answer that a final showdown would see Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, and Teddy Roosevelt doing a dagger-wielding version of a Mexican standoff, so I took it too far and walked through how I thought every president would turn out. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
Insurance Disclaimer by Andrew Steinmetz is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 The attorneys at Gillin, Jacobson, Ellis, Larsen & Lucey know what it’s like to go up against insurance companies and help accident victims and their families collect on the auto insurance claims to which they are entitled. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
DATE CITY PRIMARY CONTACT BACK-UP CONTACT 9/11/2015 El Paso Charm Mizer (915) 487-8743 Charm.Mizer@VA.gov Michelle Knerl (915) 494-1412 Michelle.Knerl@VA.gov 9/19/2015 Amarillo Juliana Walker (806) 355-9703, x7522 Juliana.Walker@VA.gov Bobby Martinez (806) 355-9703, x7755 Roberto.MartinezJr@VA.gov… [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:40 am
Professor Alex Long has passed along this wonderful post in anticipation of the Supreme Court's decision in the Caperton case: Thanks to Andrew Perlman, who invited me to blog a little about the Caperton v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
In February the Yale Law Journal held a symposium on “The Meaning of the Civil Rights Revolution,” to mark the publication of Bruce Ackerman’s book, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution: It was a terrific conference, and a fitting tribute to Professor Ackerman’s accomplishments. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
And to add insult to (financial) injury, Judge Koblitz got super-snarky in the opinion setting forth her reasoning….As first reported by Andrew Longstreth in the American Lawyer, last Friday Judge Koblitz issued her final opinion (PDF), “rejecting the firms’ arguments for mercy and ordering them to pay $1.96 million in legal fees to the defendants, Perelman’s former father-in-law and brother-in-law. [read post]
