Search for: "Andrew Siegel"
Results 141 - 152
of 152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:07 pm
Over at Prawfs, Andrew Siegel had put together a list of potential Obama nominees to the Supreme Court if Obama wins in November and a Justice resigns. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:59 am
Congrats to A (Andrew?). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 11:50 am
Partners Graphic Support Service & Supply, employment lawyer Andrew J. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 3:16 pm
., $20.00 Against the Machine: Being Human in the Age of the Electronic Mob by Lee Siegel Spiegel and Grau, 182 pp., $22.95 Republic.com 2.0 by Cass R. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 1:07 am
John Rodzvilla (Basic Books); Against the Machine: Being Human in the Age of the Electronic Mob by Lee Siegel (Spiegel and Grau); Republic.com 2.0 by Cass R. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 7:10 am
Siegel, Kenji Yoshino, and Angela P. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:07 am
the leading corporate law theorist Joe McCahery, the Giuliani biographer and former City Journal editor Fred Siegel, theologian and feminist theorist Jean Bethke Elshtain, Jean Cohen, Andrew Arato, anyway the list of very long. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 3:43 pm
The article notes the Court's odd mix of pro-plaintiff and pro-defendant rulings in employment law (mainly employment discrimination) and argue that this duality reflects two competing tendencies of the recent Supreme Court: (1) the Court retains some degree of commitment to anti-discrimination policy (which explains the Court's string of 9-0 pro-plaintiff rulings reversing appellate precedents favoring defendants); but (2) the Court has a hostility to litigation (as documented… [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 3:31 pm
Start with Andrew Siegel's excellent "Meet the Roberts Court" at PrawfsBlawg (written before the school cases came down). [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:09 am
(The canonical articles on this are by Jack's colleagues Robert Post and Reva Siegel.)The current understanding of Section 5 and of "state action" is roughly the same as in 1883, much to the shame of the American constitutional order. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 9:23 pm
Inspired by Andrew Siegel's remarks of yesterday, I'd like to jump in here and make my belated entry as well, with thanks to Dan for the invite, and apologies to all those on whom I will be inflicting my opinions in days/weeks to come. [read post]
