Search for: "Andrew v. Clements"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2018, 1:33 pm
Clement recently argued on behalf of the winning party in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
Varsity Brands to patent review in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:51 pm
Lewis and Andrew J. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:57 pm
First, congratulations to Dan Clement of the New York Divorce Report for having his post on divorce tax tips featured in the Huffington Post. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:45 pm
- New York lawyer Daniel Clement at his blog, the New York Divorce Report Are Your Lawyers Empowered to Give Extraordinary Service? [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Hein, director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, and Andrew J. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
” Leah Litman analyzes yesterday’s argument in Shular v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am
Montana, and notes that two former Solicitors General – Paul Clement and Gregory Garre – will face off in the case. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am
(Ilya Somin) A little over a year has passed since the Supreme Court’s momentous decision in NFIB v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:14 pm
The reason for the pervasive skepticism during the hour-long argument in Davis v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am
(At ACS blog, Jeffrey Clements disputes Citizens United’s criticism of the Kagan nomination.) [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
Romer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:04 am
Oakley, John V. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Andrew Sharpe has since written an excellent blog post about the case and Twitter guidelines, discussing “the danger … that lawyers may consider the risks of going over the line are too great, and so withdraw from public debate; the so-called chilling effect“. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
Andrew Crespo (Harvard 2008 / Reinhardt / S. [read post]
