Search for: "Andrew v. Clements" Results 41 - 60 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
In addition, some said Verrilli should have repeatedly focused attention on Court precedents like Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Journal of Information Policy, 6(1), 294-331, Andrew Clement and Jonathan A. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
”  And at the Atlantic, Andrew Cohen discusses what he characterizes as an inconsistency between the arguments that Paul Clement made last week on the individual mandate and those that he is making this week defending the Defense of Marriage Act in the First Circuit. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm by Ilya Somin
Judges Edith Clement and Jennifer Elrod, the other two judges on the Missouri panel, also strike me as having more civil libertarian leanings than Andrew Oldham and Edith Jones, the two more socially conservative judges in the NetChoice majority. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
’ 28 February 2012, 1pm, ‘Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom‘ – Rebecca MacKinnon’, at Polis, LSE, Clement House Room 302 (Third Floor), Clement House, 99 Aldwych. 29 February 2012, 9am-2pm. ‘Justice Wide Open‘. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
In dissent, Judge Andrew Oldham said “there’s zero difficulty … in figuring out whether it was animus or [Gonzalez’s] purportedly criminal conduct that caused her arrest. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's Fifth Circuit order in In re Mesaros, decided by Judges Edith Brown Clement, Kurt Engelhardt, and Andrew Oldham: Respondents allege that on October 30, 2020, they were travelling through Texas in a Biden-Harris tour bus. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]