Search for: "Andrews v. C. I. R" Results 41 - 60 of 358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
During all of this, only the Irish High Court, as far as I'm aware, at one point explicitly indicated that there was no suggestion that the ECJ in Réunion had had the "radical intention" of laying down a broad principle (Daly v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:09 pm by Peter Groves
  Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona has today given an opinion in SI, Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get (Case C-833/18) EU:C:2020:79: I'm baffled about the "SI" part of the case name, as the Opinion clearly describes the founder of Brompton, Andrew Ritchie, who owns much, perhaps all, of the intellectual property in the design, but in deference to the legal documents I will call him Mr SI until someone tells me to do… [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Manhattan Institute Policy Report (December 2020)).Stijn Smet, Toleration and the Law, (AOV of chapter published in Mitja Sardoč (ed), The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration (Palgrave Macmillan, 2021)).Ram Rivlin, The Morality of “Get-Threats”: Withholding Divorce as Extortion, (I·CON - International Journal of Constitutional Law 18(3) 849–869 (2020)).Andrew R. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am by Bernard Bell
In the first post in this series, I showed that the D.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
When talking about COAL as a Fischer-Tropsch source, one has to note that the source has an H/C ratio below 1, but the products have a much higher H/C ratio, above 2 for alkanes. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
    Fifth Circuit Makes a Hash of the Climate Change Case: As I noted in a prior post, the October 2009 Fifth Circuit opinion in the Comer v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
Leave requires the Court to be satisfied that the proceeding has a real and substantial connection with Australia, Australia is an appropriate forum for the proceeding, and in all the circumstances the Court should exercise jurisdiction: FCR r 10.43(4)(a)–(c). [read post]