Search for: "Andrews v. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 6:37 am
Smith, Combating FCPA Charges: Is Resistance Futile? [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:28 am by S
Andrew Smith J accepted that, while not strictly a relief from sanction case, what the Court of Appeal in Mitchell applied, i.e. either the failure to comply with a rule or order was trivial or there had to be a good reason for the failure. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:28 am by S
Andrew Smith J accepted that, while not strictly a relief from sanction case, what the Court of Appeal in Mitchell applied, i.e. either the failure to comply with a rule or order was trivial or there had to be a good reason for the failure. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:12 am
In Levicom International Holdings BV and anr v Linklaters (a firm) [2010] EWCA Civ 494, Levicom appealed against the first instance decision of  Mr Justice Andrew Smith that, although Linklaters had negligently advised Levicom, Levicom had suffered no damage as a consequence because it would have proceeded in the manner that it had even if it had received non-negligent or proper advice. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:12 am
In Levicom International Holdings BV and anr v Linklaters (a firm) [2010] EWCA Civ 494, Levicom appealed against the first instance decision of  Mr Justice Andrew Smith that, although Linklaters had negligently advised Levicom, Levicom had suffered no damage as a consequence because it would have proceeded in the manner that it had even if it had received non-negligent or proper advice. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm by Dave Maass
" EFF and the ACLU have each litigated numerous First and Fourth Amendment lawsuits related to NSA surveillance and together represent Idaho nurse Anna Smith in a similar case currently on appeal in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals called Smith v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:00 am by JB
On Friday, April 15th, the Yale Information Society Project will hold a conference at Yale Law School entitled, What Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:22 am by scanner1
CHRISTOPHER SCHANNO, ZACHARY SMITH, EDWARD STUMP, DAVID UMLAND, RICHARDO VALENZUELA, ADAM WILKINSON, LEONARD HILLIARD & DAMEION SCOTT TODD, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:34 pm
In that case, we'll check it out.P.S. - Andrew McCloskey, a USD Law graduate, loses this one. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:25 am by Russell Jackson
Once again, my friend Andrew Trask has beaten me to the punch with a post -- this time about Judge Richard Posner's decision in McReynolds v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Arizona v. [read post]