Search for: "Andrews v. Social Security Administration" Results 141 - 160 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The FieldFisher Privacy, Security and Information Law blog has questioned if the German Implementation Act undermines the GDPR. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, which asks whether a ban on social media use by sex offenders violates the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
President Franklin Roosevelt and the Court-Packing Fight President Roosevelt’s first term included the creation of the National Recovery Administration and the passage of Social Security; he entered a second term with a nearly unparalleled level of public support. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by SHG
” President Andrew Jackson famously responded to the Supreme Court’s 1832 decision in Worcester v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The Social Security administration provides a chart that lists age 62 reduction amounts and includes examples based on an estimated monthly benefit of $1000 at full retirement age. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Circuit Approval of the Constitutionality of SEC Administrative Proceedings Posted by Adam S. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Congress, this administration, and our main regulator the FCC view broadband employment/adoption as a principal goal. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
 That is the case, now usually called United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On 18 November 2015, the Administrative Court gave judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast ([2015] EWHC 3322 (Admin)). [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The scuttled measure would have required social media users to save their outgoing content for a period of 90 days. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  David Fontaine is Executive Vice President, Chief Legal & Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary of Altegrity, a privately held company that among other entities, owns Kroll’s data breach response services. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Earlier, on February 17, Texas federal trial judge Andrew Hanen had ruled against the Obama administration, and issued an injunction barring implementation of DAPA nationwide. [read post]