Search for: "Angelle v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2013, 1:41 pm
The Castle v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 12:41 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in McDonnell v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:00 am
That's what happened in Wallace v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
By Cori BadgleyIn the recent case City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 12:37 pm
But here's what I know: Lower state courts are bound to follow holdings of higher state courts. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:42 pm
By contrast, the decision by Los Angeles to ban plastic bags and to charge ten cents for every paper bag a consumer decides to get at a store is not a "tax" -- and hence does not require voter approval.Which also makes sense. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
In Iskanian v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
§ 1983 and a variety of state law theories. . . . [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 8:09 am
Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:03 am
The state already has a minimum wage, but it has become increasingly clear that state minimum wage does not equate to a living wage for the residents and workers in Los Angeles. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm
In Tseng v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 11:42 pm
An editorial at the Los Angeles Times states of the consitutional provision on copyright/patent in the context of the Fairey matterThe framers of the Constitution were so concerned about that incentive that they gave Congress the power to grant inventors and authors exclusive rights over their works in order to "promote the progress of science and the useful arts. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
A special thanks to Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Zaven V. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:25 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:42 pm
Hasen (Loyola Law School - Los Angeles) has posted Bush v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:46 am
Take, for example, the case of United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:32 am
That precedent was set in Californians Helping to Alleviate Medical Problems Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:50 pm
In Northwest Airlines,Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm
Supreme Court and California’s State Legislature are in agreement on the sensitivity of location data, the Los Angeles Department of Transportation appears to be much less convinced.EFF and OTI have called on LADOT to start taking the privacy of Los Angeles residents seriously and cease moving forward with its invasive data collection plans until it has real policies in place to protect the data. [read post]
