Search for: "Anglin v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2018, 6:27 am by rhansen
Anglin has not been served because he is not a citizen of any U.S. state. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:21 am by Adam Weinstein
On October 4, 2012, Anglin pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud before the United States District Court for the Central District of California in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:25 pm
Police Benevolent Assn., Inc. v, Anglin [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:36 am
., Inc. v Anglin, 54 AD3d 495 The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System determined that an Port Authority Police Sergeant’s final average salary was $166,432.83, a figure that did not include any of the premium payments the Sergeant had received for having to work instead of taking vacation days, etc., after the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:30 pm
In determining “final average salary,” including additional payments for working on vacation days would credit the hours in a paid vacation day twiceMatter of Port Authority Police Benevolent Association, Inc. v Anglin, 12 NY3d 885For a period of time after the events of September 11, 2001, members of the Port Authority Police Department of New York and New Jersey, were required to work 12-hour shifts and all vacation, regular days off, personal days, and compensatory… [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
In determining "final average salary," including additional payments for working on vacation days would credit the hours in a paid vacation day twiceMatter of Port Authority Police Benevolent Association, Inc. v Anglin, 2009 NY Slip Op 05198, Decided on June 24, 2009, Court of AppealsFor a period of time after the events of September 11, 2001, members of the Port Authority Police Department of New York and New Jersey, were required to work 12-hour shifts and all vacation,… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Anglin v Resler, 2020 ABCA 184 (CanLII) [16] Vicarious liability is not a distinct tort but “a theory that holds one person responsible for the misconduct of another because of the relationship between them”: 671122 Ontario v Sagaz Industries Canada, 2001 SCC 59, para 25, [2001] 2 SCR 983. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:58 pm
London Borough of Wandsworth v Allison [2008] EWCA Civ 354 is a Court of Appeal judgment on an appeal from a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal. [read post]