Search for: "Anita Krishnakumar"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2018, 8:12 am
Anita S. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:38 pm
Krishnakumar, Anita S., Dueling Canons (January 9, 2015). [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 4:31 am
One way to achieve this would be to exclude from the debt limit Treasury debt held by the Federal Reserve or trust funds such as Social Security and Medicare, as [Anita] Krishnakumar has suggested. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
Anita Krishnakumar St. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:59 am
Anita Krishnakumar has posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Notre Dame Law Review). [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Krishnakumar From Arms Race to Marketplace: The Complex Patent Ecosystem and Its Implications for the Patent System Colleen V. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:40 am
Georgia Anita S. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm
Krishnakumar is a law professor at St. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:07 pm
At Concurring Opinions, Anita Krishnakumar writes about the Court's recent opinion in Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:15 am
Anita Krishnakumar has posted this draft on SSRN. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 9:02 pm
Krishnakumar . [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 10:57 pm
Anita S. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:46 am
Anita S. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:39 am
Anita Krishnakumar offers this blog post on her forthcoming William and Mary article on the Holy Trinity Church case and what she terms the "unique national institution" canon. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
You will find here links to Anita Krishnakumar's article on legislatures and representation reinforcement, as well as an election law symposium featuring articles by Mark Tushnet (introduction), Heather S. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Anita Krishnakumar has posted this draft on SSRN. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
Anita Krishnakumar has written this blog post at Concurring Opinions.... [read post]
31 May 2008, 3:36 pm
Krishnakumar, "The 'Mischief Rule' Rule and the VRA in Riley v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:29 pm
Anita Krishnakumar has a really interesting post on Concurring Opinions about the constitutional avoidance doctrine in statutory interpretation and a recent Supreme Court case. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:32 am
And, after reading this opinion against the backdrop of Anita Krishnakumar's recent ACCA exegises at CO here and here, I likely will not be the only one who keeps in mind the hazards of predicting the views of various Justices in modern federal criminal justice debates. [read post]
