Search for: "Anker v. State" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2007, 8:27 am
Anker, “Determining Asylum Claims in the United States: A Case Study on the Implementation of Legal Norms in an Unstructured Adjudicatory Environment,” 19 N.Y.U. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
  Select Entangled Legalities beyond the State Entangled Legalities beyond the State pp i-i PDF HTML Select Global Law Series - Series page Global Law Series - Series page pp ii-ii PDF HTML Select Entangled Legalities beyond the State - Title page Entangled Legalities beyond the State - Title page  pp iii-iii PDF HTML Select Copyright page Copyright page  pp iv-iv PDF HTML Select Contents Contents pp v-vii… [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm by law shucks
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:14 am by Law Shucks
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]