Search for: "Annemarie Bridy"
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
Annemarie Bridy, Google: You have to build for compliance while you’re deciding—there are workflows that need to be created or rejiggered. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 1:06 pm
The recent literature on the copyrightability of machine-generated texts is vast, starting with Annemarie Bridy, Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author, 2012 Stan. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Annemarie Bridy: reproduction right? [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am
Annemarie Bridy, Google & Yale Information Society Project Testing the Server Tes [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Annemarie Bridy: Google sees a ton of DMCA abuse. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:30 am
Annemarie Bridy In 2012, Twitter executive Tony Wang proudly described his company as “the free-speech wing of the free-speech party. [read post]
22 May 2019, 1:05 pm
Annemarie Bridy writes on filters and the fate of safe harbors. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 7:01 am
"Annemarie Bridy agrees:"The implied license should cover any actual or virtual appearance of the tattoo as long as it’s incidental to the appearance of the tattooed person. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
As an example, Jack cites Annemarie Bridy’s idea that a court might treat AI-produced art as equivalent to a ‘work made for hire’ if doing so minimizes the need to change existing copyright law. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
In a Q&A with Professor Annemarie Bridy the Stanford Cyberlaw Blog has debated the regulation of speech online in light of her new paper Remediating Social Media: Why Layers Still Matter for Internet Policy. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
On Friday 13 April 2018 Warby J handed down public and private judgments in two “right to be forgotten” cases: NT1 and NT2 v Google (public judgment [2018] EWHC 799 (QB)). [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Annemarie Bridy, Fearless Girl Meets Charging Bull: Copyright and the Regulation of IntertextualityDiModica (who made Charging Bull) complained that Fearless Girl’s placement created an unauthorized derivative work and violated VARA by being a material alteration that prejudiced his honor—Charging Bull was no longer optimistic but transformed into a threat. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Panel Summary by Annemarie Bridy Panelists: Annemarie Bridy - Professor of Law, University of Idaho; Affiliate Scholar, Stanford Center for Internet and Society Ben Sheffner - Senior Vice President & Associate General Counsel, Copyright & Legal Affairs, Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:59 am
Annemarie Bridy, University of Idaho College of Law; Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society, is publishing Fearless Girl Meets Charging Bull: Copyright and the Regulation of Intertextuality in the UC Irvine Law Review (2018). [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
University of Michigan School of LawAnnemarie Bridy, Professor of Law & Affiliate Scholar, University of Idaho College of Law, presents today as part of the Intellectual Property Workshop Series: Charging Bull’ Meets ‘Fearless Girl:’ Intertextuality and the Problem of Moral Rights. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
From Annemarie Bridy and Daphne Keller’s submission to the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm
From Annemarie Bridy and Daphne Keller’s submission to the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
From Annemarie Bridy and Daphne Keller’s submission to the U.S. [read post]
