Search for: "Annemarie Bridy"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2014, 11:38 am
And without a takedown from a copyright owner, there's no counternotification, so the user who thinks she's got a valid fair use claim can't even counternotify, as many people who've run afoul of Content ID have discovered.)Annemarie Bridy, University of Idaho College of Law: §512 has proven resilient in the face of internet evolution. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am
Annemarie Bridy, Google & Yale Information Society Project Testing the Server Tes [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
I joined the IP and Internet Law Professors amicus brief by David Post and Annemarie Bridy. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 9:25 am
Such cooperation combined with a change in definition of “mere conduit” will likely result in what Annemarie Bridy terms private ordering graduated response: graduated response by agreement between private companies, outside of government process. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
From Annemarie Bridy and Daphne Keller’s submission to the U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm
By Dennis Crouch A group of sixty US intellectual property law professors have signed a letter to Congress supporting anti-troll patent reform legislation. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
On Friday 13 April 2018 Warby J handed down public and private judgments in two “right to be forgotten” cases: NT1 and NT2 v Google (public judgment [2018] EWHC 799 (QB)). [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:38 am
For example, my colleagues Annemarie Bridy and Harold Feld have each suggested that provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act requiring Internet service providers to terminate Internet access for “repeat [copyright] infringers” could face renewed scrutiny after Packingham. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
An engineer manager/product designer who feels the same way may also be able to produce the privacy trickle down.Cyberlaw & Intermediary Liability DMCA+ Enforcement in the New gTLDs Annemarie Bridy Rise of DMCA plus enforcement. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
As an example, Jack cites Annemarie Bridy’s idea that a court might treat AI-produced art as equivalent to a ‘work made for hire’ if doing so minimizes the need to change existing copyright law. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Annemarie Bridy: Google sees a ton of DMCA abuse. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Annemarie Bridy: reproduction right? [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
From Annemarie Bridy and Daphne Keller’s submission to the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
In a Q&A with Professor Annemarie Bridy the Stanford Cyberlaw Blog has debated the regulation of speech online in light of her new paper Remediating Social Media: Why Layers Still Matter for Internet Policy. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
I recently had the privilege of speaking about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at the Fordham 24th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, a stellar international IP conference. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
John's James Boyle thepublicdomain Duke Donald Braman donaldbraman George Washington Barbara Bressler bbressle DePaul Annemarie Bridy AnnemarieBridy Idaho Kim Brooks SchulichLawDean Dalhousie Rosa Brooks brooks_rosa Georgetown Dorothy A. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
Annemarie Bridy, University of Idaho College of Law The Author in the Machine: Copyright in the Age of Digital Production Computer authorship has been on people’s minds for a while, since at least 1965—people filed registrations for works at least partly authored by computers. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
John's James Boyle thepublicdomain Duke Donald Braman donaldbraman George Washington Barbara Bressler bbressle DePaul Annemarie Bridy AnnemarieBridy Idaho Kim Brooks SchulichLawDean Dalhousie Rosa Brooks brooks_rosa Georgetown Dorothy A. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]
