Search for: "Anonymous v. Simon" Results 21 - 40 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Events On 26 October 2021 there will be an event at Inner Temple poses the question “Is There a Case for Anonymity in Social Media? [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
Austin's sign code prevents speakers who want to use digital signs from remaining anonymous, thus chilling unpopular, minority, and anonymous speech. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Scotland The Guardian reports on a campaign to enshrine the right to lifelong anonymity for complainants in rape cases. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Unmasking Anonymous Online Infringers of Personality Rights: Questions Arising in International Contexts, 17 Yearbook of Private International Law pp. 181-208, 2015/2016, Koji Takahashi, Doshisha University Law School. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Twitter has said there is no evidence of bot networks being used to manipulate the conversation around the coronavirus pandemic in the UK, contradicting widely-circulated claims that the government was using anonymous online accounts to boost its standing. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Emily Yoffe] “Harvard Debuts Anonymous Online Title IX Reporting Form” [Simone Chu and Iris Lewis, The Crimson] “Bias Response Teams Silence Civic Debate” [George LaNoue, Law and Liberty on Speech First v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
” As Warby J said in Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) – “This is a beguilingly simple sentence. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation The Information Law and Policy Centre has analysed whether lifelong anonymity orders are still fit for purpose in the social media era. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Simon Dawes considered the controversy in an INFORRM post. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette considers how national newspapers have criticised the ruling for creating a “new right to anonymity”, lawyers have advocated media outlets be cautionary in wake of the judgment and the claimant, Cliff Richard’s, perspective. [read post]