Search for: "Anthony Falzone"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2008, 9:58 pm
RDR Books, represented by Anthony Falzone of Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society, has appealed their case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 6:16 am
Which brings me back to Anthony Falzone, who is defending Fairey in the copyright suit. [read post]
17 May 2007, 7:53 pm
That's how Anthony Falzone, Executive Director of Stanford's Fair Use Project, describes the Marilyn Monroe opinion discussed earlier here and here:"Is this a big deal? [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:30 am
Donaldson and Lincoln Bandlow of Los Angeles; Anthony Falzone of the Fair Use Project at Stanford Law School; F. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:44 pm
See Anthony Falzone's blog post and brief at http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6230 [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:35 pm
Falzone’s effort for the Petitioners was especially impressive. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 10:30 am
Anthony Falzone is Executive Director of Stanford University’s Fair Use project and has defended fair use as an exception to copyright and a key “safety valve” for free expression in several high-profile cases. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
As Stanford Fair Use cyber-attorney Anthony Falzone reports: ” our clients challenge the constitutionality of the URAA, which “restores” copyright protection in thousands of foreign works the Copyright Act had previously placed in the Public Domain. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:53 am
Anthony Falzone from Standford’s Fair Use Project gave a superb lecture on the impact of fair use on scholarship and free speech at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill on Tuesday. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:02 pm
Anthony Falzone writes about the court's decision to stop publication of The Harry Potter Lexicon, ruling against Fair Use. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 1:34 pm
In a post I quoted here, about the recent Marilyn Monroe decision (holding that her publicity rights had not survived her death), Anthony Falzone, director of Stanford's Fair Use Project, said, "Millions of licensing revenue stands to disappear under this decision. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:29 am
Following up on my earlier post about Anthony Falzone’s lecture and his strong emphasis on the need to limit copyright to the minimum protection necessary to encourage creativity in order to avoid the harmful effects of a monopoly over speech, three related items came to my attention this week. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 2:54 pm
Fair Use, Free Speech and Social ValueAnthony Falzone, Esq. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:45 am
The new affiliates are the following: Affiliate Scholars Marvin Ammori Annemarie Bridy Peter Asaro Ryan Calo Danielle Citron Ben Depoorter Henry Farrell Brett Frischmann Woodrow Hartzog Elizabeth Joh Sonia Katyal David Levine Patrick Lin Andrea Matwyshyn Arvind Narayanan Brian Nussbaum Miquel Peguera Stephanie Pell Neil Richards Scott Shackelford Shaheen ShariffVictoria Stodden Omer Tene Elizabeth Townsend Gard Jeffrey Vagle Beth Van Schaack Bryant Walker Smith Junior Affiliate… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 1:06 pm
" Aided by the Stanford Law School Fair Use Project, the scholar -- Carol Shloss -- had brought an unusual "copyright misuse" action against the estate, which settled, but she then was awarded $326,000 in legal fees as the prevailing party.The Fair Use Project's Anthony Falzone reacts here. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 5:29 pm
In December Stanford Law School's Anthony Falzone â€â [read post]
31 May 2007, 7:28 pm
The amount of the fees hasn't yet been set, but Anthony Falzone of Stanford's Fair Use Project, which represents Shloss in the lawsuit, says "we hope this demonstrates that inadequate respect for fair use's critical role in scholarly inquiry and free expression can have substantial and serious consequences. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:36 am
Anthony Falzone (petitioners), Solicitor General Donald Verilli (respondents) Florence v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:38 am
Fairey's lawyers, including Anthony T. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:01 pm
Yesterday, in our post on the copyright flap between J.K. [read post]
