Search for: "Anthony v. Miller" Results 61 - 80 of 265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am by Stephen Wermiel
The obscenity standard deeply split the court throughout the 1960s until the court settled on a rule in 1973 in Miller v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Last week’s oral argument in in Trump v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Grant
The judge then turned things over to lead prosecutor Mark Miller, who called five witnesses in succession: Aaron Morgan, retired Navy sailor and Cole crew member; Anthony Duback, FBI special agent; Paul Fennewald, retired FBI special agent; Robert Holley, retired FBI special agent and Michael Marks, retired Naval Criminal Investigative Service agent, via video teleconference (VTC). [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
Anthony Bellia and Bradford Clark argued that Justice Neil Gorsuch correctly interpreted the meaning of the Alien Tort Statute during arguments for Jesner v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 10:37 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am by David LaBahn
As Justice Anthony Kennedy cautioned in City of Ontario v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico, Richard Primus points out that “the travel-ban case offers [Justice Anthony] Kennedy the chance to overrule a widely reviled decision that has never been officially overruled: Korematsu v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am by Michael Lowe
  The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]