Search for: "Anthony v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2011, 12:51 am by John Steele
Kuhl, Los Angeles County Superior Court; Professor Joseph Grodin, Hastings College of the Law 2004 - “Judges, Lawyers and Law Reform”Justice Anthony Kennedy, U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:28 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Anthony Califano and Lynn Kappelman On April 12, 2013, a federal judge in the Western District of Pennsylvania issued an order striking Plaintiff’s class claims in Semenko v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am by Paul Smith
  As an example of the Court mistakenly taking a cautious approach, he cites Bowers v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
, Kavanaugh joined an opinion holding that a police reserve officer’s emails to his superiors, in which he cc’d his co-workers, were not protected under the balancing test adopted by the Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
British Columbia, 2016 SCC 42 (35843) (36456) Superior court judges in Ontario and B.C. have the discretionary statutory power under their class action legislation to sit outside their home provinces. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
Casey, I find almost nothing to cheer about in the Court's decision last week in Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Disciplinary probationReillo v New York State Thruway Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 02170, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentNew York State Thruway Authority employee Anthony Reillo was served with  disciplinary charges alleging certain misconduct. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Disciplinary probationReillo v New York State Thruway Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 02170, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentNew York State Thruway Authority employee Anthony Reillo was served with  disciplinary charges alleging certain misconduct. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:19 pm by Anthony Carbone, PC
R.M.W. addresses two legal issues of first impression decided by a family court judge in Superior Court. [read post]