Search for: "Any Test Franchising, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
Jani-King of Philadelphia, Inc., September 21, 2016, Fisher, D.). [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:38 pm
” Sirius XM Radio, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 7:24 am
The ICL incorporates the three-prong “ABC” test applied in many states nationwide, which presumes that an individual who performs any service is an employee of a purported employer unless the purported employer can satisfy the test. 7-Eleven argued that the FTC Franchise Rule makes it impossible for it to satisfy the first prong of the ABC test. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
San Gabriel Transit, Inc., the California Court of Appeal concluded otherwise. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
San Gabriel Transit, Inc., the California Court of Appeal concluded otherwise. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:31 am
Universal Television Network, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 11:31 pm
The test used by California is discussed here. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:38 am
App., 1st Cir., Nov. 2, 2018). [5] UTELCOM, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm
Franchise. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
Loblaw Companies Limited, Metro Ontario Inc. and Sobeys Inc. are recalling various products containing granola from the marketplace because of possible Salmonella contamination. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:31 pm
Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc., 860 F. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
The second case – Kalologie Franchising LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 10:40 pm
Joint employer liability can arise in many different contexts, such as when using staffing agencies, management companies, or in even in the franchise context. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:52 am
Sybra, Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:52 am
By Jason Rantanen ABB Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 3:37 am
In Papa John's International, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
In MMM Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Garfield & Johnson Enterprises, Inc., et al., 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:53 pm
The franchisor maintained that it sells franchises and trains and supports the franchises, but neither cleans any establishment nor employs anyone who cleans any establishment. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 8:11 pm
In both opinions, the OTA ruled in favor of the California Franchise Tax Board, holding each taxpayer failed to meet its respective burden to substantiate the R&D tax credit claimed. [read post]
