Search for: "Aplin v. State"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
Aplin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
Aplin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
Aplin, S.L. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
The question is not whether some readers would have misunderstood the satire as stating facts but whether the average or reasonable reader would have come to that view. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am
Tanya Aplin & Lionel Bently, Global Mandatory Fair Use, AU Book Talk. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
It stated that the claimant had been passing confidential information to ex-employees of CSP who were working for a rival agency and that criminal proceedings were being considered (for the full text, see [4]). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am
Florence ...As Cornish, Llewlyn and Aplin explain in the latest edition of their IP textbook, this means that creative intellectual activity must produce "the right kind of work". [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
App. 2008), and Aplin v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:13 pm
English courts have stated more clearly that Art 8 does not protect corporate reputation (Euromoney Institutional Investor Plc v Aviation News Ltd at [20]), and also seem suspicious of the idea that it is protected by A1P1 (Ajinomoto Sweeteners V Asda Stores Ltd at [29]). [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
As explained by Cornish, Llewelyn and Aplin, to fall within section 30 CDPA exception, it is required that (1) the event itself is current (so no extracts from football matches that took place years ago); and (2) the dealing is fair. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:24 am
The right of integrity under UK law draws upon Article 6bis of the Berne Convention, but - according to Cornish, Llewelyn and Aplin, is even in "apparently narrower terms”. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:55 pm
" Encyclopaedia Britannica v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
United States A jury is considering the merits of a $850 million libel claim in the case of Bouveng v Wey. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
The other day, this Kat heard Professor Lionel Bentley talking about his recent research with Professor Tanya Aplin looking at the scope of the Quotation exception. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm
This is very similar to the approach adopted by the High Court of this Jurisdiction in NT1 v Google and in Ireland in Townsend v Google under the pre-GDPR data protection legislation. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
Aplin and Dr. [read post]
