Search for: "Apodaca v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 10:50 am
Louisiana[1] was an unremarkable end to the anachronistic Apodaca v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 7:09 am
Here's the full text of the new case, Ramos v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Believing that Apodaca was a precedent, the courts of Louisiana and Oregon tried thousands of cases under rules allowing conviction by a vote of 11 to 1 or 10 to 2, and appellate courts in those States upheld these convictions based on Apodaca. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:24 am
In 1972, the Supreme Court ruled in Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Luis Alberto Zambrana La decisión de Ramos v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
Louisiana, the Supreme Court overruled Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:28 am
” However, Gorsuch explained, it “turns out that the Sixth Amendment’s otherwise simple story took a strange turn” with the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:12 am
This brief section (pp. 9-11 of the slip opinion) tries to make sense of Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:02 am
One issue dividing justices in Ramos is the treatment of precedent, as the decision overturned Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:26 am
They would have upheld nonunanimous verdicts because of the past precedent supporting them, the splintered decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
From Apodaca-Fisk v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:45 am
In Apodaca v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:52 am
And in a split decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:50 pm
In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:01 pm
Nearly 50 years ago, in Apodaca v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:39 am
Nearly 50 years ago, in Apodaca v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:05 am
In Apodaca v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:00 pm
Supreme Court decided to hear Apodaca v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:00 pm
Supreme Court decided to hear Apodaca v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
’” In light of Timbs, the brief urges the court to revisit its 1972-decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
