Search for: "Appeal Board v. US Steel Corp." Results 101 - 107 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
[TTABlog Note: See the CAFC's decision in a companion case (here), holding that the term STEELBUILDING.COM is not generic for Applicant's services, but is merely descriptive and lacks secondary meaning.]April 18, 2007 - 2 PM: Diamonique Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 7:03 pm
US Steel Corp    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland AGE DISCRIMINATION; OHIO LAW: retired employees failed to make claim; SJ affirmed 07a0091a.06 2007/03/06 Petty v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
Accordingly, the Board found that the lead persons did not exercise supervisory authority under the Act. [read post]