Search for: "Appeal of Fields (roger D.)" Results 21 - 40 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
One lesson from these examples: use as a trademark is a concept so useful that even after courts of appeals rejected a decade ago it as a separate limit in cases involving keyword advertising, it is still constantly being reinvented and applied to solve otherwise difficult problems: trademark use is a simple way to explain why we shouldn’t do a complicated and expensive and error-prone likely confusion analysis when defendants are engaging in behavior that on its face seems… [read post]
14 May 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
(Other claims that defendants didn't appeal will as well.) [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Secondly, as to (B), the cost of the necessary expert examination of Rogers’ systems would be at least $50,000. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Nor did it need to decide whether to adopt the rule of Rogers v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 7:33 pm by Seth Davis
Circuit made short work of the petition for review in an opinion by Judge Randolph, joined by Judge Rogers and Judge Pillard. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
On his blog, William D. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:52 pm by Dave Wieneke
In the course of their appeals, The Slants found the PTO had received over 800 applications for marks containing the word “slant. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by lawmrh
" And Will Rogers was right when he said, "You could keep politics clean if you could figure out some way so your government never hired anyone. [read post]