Search for: "Appeal of Moore"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2019, 9:15 am
This past week in Other Barks & Bites: the USPTO delays the effective date for mandating electronic trademark application submissions and issues a proposed rulemaking on Patent Term Adjustments in light of Supernus; UKIPO report shows that women inventors represent only 12.7 percent of inventors worldwide; trademark dispute leads street artist Banksy to open a retail store; the Federal Circuit upholds the invalidation of method of manufacture claims as being directed to a natural law over a… [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Could these be appealed? [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:40 am
The court in Moore, however (overruling the 12th District Court of Appeals) held that the plaintiff does have standing to assert constitutional due process and equal protection claims. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
Moore v City of Eugene, 2020 WL 7770886 (OR App. 12/30/2020) [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:15 am
The opinion, authored by Chief Judge Kimberley Moore,... [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part from a decision authored by CAFC Judge Moore yesterday, explaining that, while she agrees that New Vision Gaming’s request for vacatur and remand of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in light of Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 9:17 am
In the previous ruling, Judge Thelma Wyatt Cummings Moore rejected air permits that the state had issued for a 1,200 MW coal-fired power plant at the Longleaf Energy Station. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 1:45 pm
Several weeks ago, in a non-precedential opinion, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in In re: David Tropp, which vacated and remanded a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
Chief Judge Moore authored the opinion. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
Chief Judge Moore authored the opinion. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), with Chief Judge Moore writing for the court, vacated and remanded a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision, stating the PTAB erred in construing the claims of Magseis’ U.S. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part from a decision authored by CAFC Judge Moore yesterday, explaining that, while she agrees that New Vision Gaming’s request for vacatur and remand of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in light of Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in an opinion authored by Judge Moore, has ruled that the current statutory scheme for appointing Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) violates the Appointments Clause of the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 1:10 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued yesterday. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
The DJ reports Commission on Judicial Appointments Confirms Three to Court of Appeal:Those confirmed include superior court judges Helen Bendix and Carl Moor as 2nd District Court of Appeal justices, as well as 6th District Court of Appeal Justice Mary Greenwood, who was elevated to presiding justice.All three appointees, rated as “exceptionally well qualified” by the Judicial Evaluation Nomination Commission, were appointed by Gov. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 11:23 am
Not all judges agreed with the decision of the court, as Judge Karen Moore dissented. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:20 pm
According to North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore, Republican congressional leaders asked the state Attorney General Josh Stein to appeal the Superior Court’s order. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
Permission to appeal had been refused on paper by Sir Richard Buxton on 6 March 2012 but granted by Moore-Bick LJ at an oral hearing on 26 March 2012. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:47 am
Moore v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
On appeal, the Moores initially challenged the court’s jurisdiction by arguing that a directed rehearing was not an appealable judgment or decree under TEX. [read post]
