Search for: "Appeal of National Retail Transportation, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus and Andrew W. Eklund
This past week, several consumer actions made headlines that affect the retail industry. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:17 am by Epstein Becker Green
The appeal of these technologies is obvious, and they may streamline a cumbersome and expensive hiring process for retailers. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus
This past week, several consumer actions made headlines that affect the retail industry. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:38 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  In a decision discussed below, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that local couriers who make deliveries to Postmates’ customers of products they pick up from retail stores are not interstate transportation workers. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:50 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
On May 23, the Tenth Circuit will hear a case brought by Hobby Lobby Stores, a national craft supply retail chain of 500 stores in over 40 states, employing over 13,000 people, based in Oklahoma City. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:15 pm by WCK Director
"    Author Rebecca Shafer, JD, President of Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. is a national expert in the field of workers compensation. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Amici The National Retail Federation and Rent-A-Center, Inc. took aim at the central issue in Iskanian – the fate of Gentry in the wake of Concepcion. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm by Howard Knopf
It held that the transmission over the Internet of a musical work that results in a download of that work is not a communication by telecommunication: see also Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987), where the Court struck down an LAX airport policy that prohibited (literally) all "First Amendment activities" on [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
In the Michigan Court of Appeals, Case Nos. 317434 & 317456 (unpublished). [read post]