Search for: "Appeal of Scott (edward R.)" Results 1 - 20 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2012, 7:53 am by Jeralyn
And what if he is convicted, but wins on appeal, with the appeals court ruling the judge erred in allowing the testimony? [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:14 pm
If you have any questions regarding living trusts, or any other aspect of estate planning, contact the Law Office of Scott C. [read post]
23 May 2014, 5:40 pm
The Internal Revenue Service denied Zampella's credit and the Court of Appeals affirmed. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:08 pm
The appeals court said one could not infer a grant of power to Judy Goldman that contradicted Edward Goldman's express wishes. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:58 pm
The Court of Appeals noted its job was to determine the intent of Edward and Ann Muldoon at the time they made the trust in 1998. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:24 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit says that the Securities and Exchange Commission did not abuse its discretion when it determined that broker Scott Mathis “willfully” withheld information from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority about tax liens. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
Circuit Court of Appeals rules that hearsay testimony is admissible to support the issuance of a preliminary injunctionMullins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:59 am by David Lat
[BuzzFeed via How Appealing] * Those unsealed Trump University documents we mentioned yesterday? [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Courts of Appeals, Part II, 1891–1950. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 6:21 am
And, given the stakes involved for both sides of the litigation in this sort of preliminary ruling, I would expect one to come soon:1 Parents have two opportunities for appeal, [Scott] McCown said. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:33 pm by SO Issues
Original Article Excerpt: Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court erred in assessing 30 points against him under risk factor 5, for the age of the victim, and 20 points against him under risk factor 6, for the physical helplessness of the victim. [read post]