Search for: "Appel v. Levine"
Results 41 - 60
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 5:51 am
Levine, her employer and manager, respectively, on the ground that "`a cause of action based on a perceived [physical] disability is not a legally recognized action in Connecticut.'" Desrosiers v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
Levin 10. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:38 am
Levine (prescription drugs, no Medical Device Amendments’ preemption clause) and Medtronic v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:02 am
Term, 2nd Dept., 2nd, 11th & 13th, decided 10/23/2009) Order of Richmond Civil (Katherine Levine, J.) [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
Steed v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
" Levine v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:07 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Levine 7. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 6:39 am
The case standing for that proposition is Levin v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:05 pm
The appellate court disagreed, finding that the defense expert's methodology, using a computer-based mathematical model to evaluate the delivery, did not meet the requirements of Frye v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am
at 517, citing Matter of Levine v New York State Liq. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm
A recent treatment of that question is by Ronald Levin. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm
Remember what Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 12:40 pm
(Hawran v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:57 am
Prorok v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:57 am
Prorok v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:57 am
[BREAKING NEWS -- please check back soon for more detail in a follow-up post that will be based on the official recording of today's appellate hearing]Two highly experienced litigation reporters who attended today's Oracle v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:12 am
Now, Levine v Harriton & Furrer, LLP ; 2012 NY Slip Op 01401 ; Appellate Division, Third Department discusses the same subject, this time for an engineer. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:41 am
Now, Levine v Harriton & Furrer, LLP ; 2012 NY Slip Op 01401 ; Decided on February 23, 2012; Appellate Division, Third Department discusses the same subject, this time for an engineer. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 4:56 am
Corp. v Denenberg 2021 NY Slip Op 02463 [193 AD3d 593] April 22, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department they spent little time affirming. [read post]
