Search for: "Appellate Defender v Engel" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2010, 2:50 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order in the following matter: OP 10-0310, 2010 MT 168, OFFICE OF THE APPELLATE DEFENDER, Petitioner, v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
  And therein hangs the tale of today’s case, Eckler and Engel v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:35 am by Ray Mullman
Dechert's website had the following about their recent win in a lawsuit against Fundamental: Dechert attorneys obtained a favorable judgment issued on Feb. 7 by the First Department of the New York Appellate Division in Fundamental Long Term Care Holdings LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:15 am by Anita Davies
The scope of art 6 rights have proved a problematic issue for the European Court of Human Rights in its jurisprudence, and a considerable body of case law has been required to clarify and define the terms ‘charge’ and ‘criminal’ under art 6 (see Engel v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:21 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The appellate court also noted that Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 402(a) allows for an individual to be served by handing a copy to the defendant or by handing a copy at any usual place of business of the defendant. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 10:45 am
App. 3d 607 (1st Dist. 1985) (holding that the dangers associated with train flipping are not open and obvious to children and the defendants had a duty to repair holes in fences surrounding the trains) and Engel v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:30 am by Daniel Sokol
The case of Engel v The Netherlands (no. 1) (1976) 1 EHRR 647 put forward three factors when deciding whether or not a person is charged with a criminal offence: The classification of the proceedings under national law (i.e., whether they are classed as civil or criminal proceedings); The ‘essential’ nature of the proceedings; The penalty that the applicant risks incurring. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:29 pm by Matt Johnston
An appellate ruling should be handed down in the next couple of weeks.If, after reading all this information and Engel's story, you want to help defray the costs of Frimpong's defense, click here. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Maryland Court of Appeals reached a decision in University of Maryland Medical System v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Maryland Court of Appeals reached a decision in University of Maryland Medical System v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 3:47 am by Peter Mahler
“A fiduciary may breach his duties by exercising his contractual rights in an unfair or inequitable manner” (citing Lacher v Engel, 33 AD3d 10 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]