Search for: "Apple, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2019, 6:15 am
Pepper, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 5:07 pm
United States Case: Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:18 pm
As if to prove Liptak's point, today the Supreme Court decided Apple Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
” Further, it was only required that the taxpayer establish that the “dominant purpose” for the borrowing was to generate taxable income in order to overcome the California Franchise Tax Board’s assertion that the use of an indirect allocation method was required to attribute the expense to taxable and non-taxable income. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:26 pm
See e.g., Appeal of Zenith National Insurance Corp. and Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:55 am
Wyoming, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 12:43 pm
Franchise Tax Board, 673 Fed. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Yesterday’s argument in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
Delaware promptly copied New Jersey's statute with a modest franchise tax and the rest is history. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
In the last five terms alone, the Supreme Court has decided seven tax cases, six ERISA cases, five Title VII cases, and five cases under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm
Mandelman, Inc. lost all rights and powers for failure to meet statutory filing requirements of either the Secretary of State’s office or the Franchise Tax Board.Agent for Service of Process Okay, Mandelman Inc. was a corporation I used to do some publishing and consulting under, although I haven’t done such work in quite some time… maybe 8-10 years. [read post]
