Search for: "Apple Bank for Sav. v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 2:42 am
They alleged generally that defendants continued to represent them during the three years preceding the commencement of the action, but failed to allege that that representation pertained to the specific matters at issue (see Apple Bank for Sav. v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 70 AD3d 438 [2010]; Serino v Lipper, 47 AD3d 70, 76 [2007], lv dismissed 10 NY3d 930 [2008]). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
As a result, there was no mutual understanding between the parties that MGA would provide Reville with any further representation in connection with this alleged unlawful transaction (see also, Apple Bank for Sav. v PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, 23 Misc 3d 1126 [A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50948 [U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2009], revd 70 AD3d 438 [l51 Dept 2010]). [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:50 am
Apple Bank for Sav. v. [read post]
