Search for: "Apple Computer Inc. v. Microsoft Corp" Results 21 - 40 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
NSA cracked most online encryption says report http://t.co/bhT5ivFMCH -> Apple hit with U.S. injunction in e-books antitrust case http://t.co/MfZiVtvyvr -> Fracking fight over patent infringement heating up http://t.co/ozpPMVJs6C -> ‘Very significant gaps’ remain in reaching Canada-EU free trade deal: Harper http://t.co/Uz79rmUbYe -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-09-07 http://t.co/fU4RYSNmpG -> What To Do If You Get A Patent Troll… [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm by Florian Mueller
It notes toward the end that "Apple's unique operating system at least sets its mobile devices and computers apart". [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:17 am by Pilar G. Kraman
Patent No. 7,155,451 related to "methods of automating the presentation of computer content," which is asserted against Microsoft Corp. and Apple Inc. in two civil actions. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
 [6] The graphical user interface lawsuit between Apple and Microsoft in the 90s provides insight.Applied to Microsoft WindowsIn 1994, Apple sued Microsoft over the Windows user interface, which Apple claimed infringed on their GUI's original look and feel.[7] I was using a Mac at the time, and I was sure that Apple would win, even though I knew that Microsoft wasn’t the only copycat.[8] While… [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Academic Games League of Am., Inc. 89 F.3d 614 (9th Cir. 1996) 14 Apple Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by Dennis Crouch
  The technical standards that enable our computers, mobile phones and home entertainment gear to communicate and interoperate are developed by corps of “volunteers” who get together in person and virtually under the auspices of standards-development organizations (SDOs). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am by Marie Louise
: Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer (World Trademark Review) (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) Copyright protection should apply to functions of computer programs, software company claims in ECJ case: SAS v World Programming (Out-Law) How do you solve a problem like Orphan Works? [read post]